Comments on: 2007 Upper Deck Artifacts Baseball – Bust #0013 http://bustingwax.com/2008/03/14/2007-upper-deck-artifacts-baseball-bust-0013/ Busting some wax and sharing the contents Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:42:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Tony http://bustingwax.com/2008/03/14/2007-upper-deck-artifacts-baseball-bust-0013/comment-page-1/#comment-106 Tony Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:33:34 +0000 http://bustingwax.com/2008/03/14/2007-upper-deck-artifacts-baseball-bust-0013/#comment-106 @Steve - Yeah, the card itself is a sharp looking card. I even got a hint of a second color there on the left side. It just would have been nice to have a different player. I would have even settled for a White Sox player :) Especially if it was Jim Thome. @Steve – Yeah, the card itself is a sharp looking card. I even got a hint of a second color there on the left side. It just would have been nice to have a different player. I would have even settled for a White Sox player :)

Especially if it was Jim Thome.

]]> By: Steve G. http://bustingwax.com/2008/03/14/2007-upper-deck-artifacts-baseball-bust-0013/comment-page-1/#comment-99 Steve G. Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:42:42 +0000 http://bustingwax.com/2008/03/14/2007-upper-deck-artifacts-baseball-bust-0013/#comment-99 Even though it's a Cubs player, that's still a nice looking card. Even though it’s a Cubs player, that’s still a nice looking card.

]]>